Showing 3321 - 3330 of 4077 for "Makarim & Taira S" with applied filters
19 August 2025 by asialaw
asialaw's Deal of the Month for August 2025 is...
19 August 2025 by asialaw
asialaw's Lawyer of the Month for August 2025 is...
01 August 2025 by CMS INDUSLAW - India
CMS INDUSLAW is pleased to announce that Vinit Patwari has joined the firm as a Partner in our Transactions practice, based in the Mumbai office.
21 July 2025 by asialaw
asialaw's Deal of the Month for July 2025 is...
21 July 2025 by asialaw
asialaw's Lawyer of the Month for July 2025 is...
16 July 2025 by VILAF - Vietnam
In a high-value cross-border financing transaction, a foreign lender (the “Lender”), a foreign arranger (the “Arranger”), and a Vietnamese real estate developer (the “Borrower”) entered into a facility agreement (the “Facility Agreement”) under which the Lender agreed to extend a loan of up to USD 400 million. As consideration, the Borrower undertook to pay a total of USD 20 million in front-end and arrangement fees (the “Fees”)..
15 July 2025 by IndusLaw - India
CMS INDUSLAW is pleased to announce that Paras Parekh has joined as a Partner, further strengthening our dispute resolution and financial regulatory practice in our Mumbai Office.
14 July 2025 by Zaid Ibrahim & Co - Malaysia
Zaid Ibrahim & Co is pleased to announce the promotion of its deputy managing partner, Amin Abdul Majid as its new managing partner, effective 14 July 2025.
07 July 2025 by Global Law Office - China
On June 18, 2025, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange of China (the “SAFE”) released the “Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Matters Related to Deepening Reforms in Foreign Exchange Administration for Cross-border Investment and Financing (Draft for Public Comments)” (hereinafter referred to as the “Notice”) and solicited public comments.
01 July 2025 by Lee & Ko - South Korea
In a significant win for patent holders operating in the digital marketplace, the IP Group at Lee & Ko has secured a pivotal ruling from Korea’s IP High Court. The Court recognized that posting and selling products covered by Korean patents on overseas e-commerce platforms can constitute an "offer for sale" in Korea and may infringe Korean patent rights.
