Director, Counsel

1 Coleman Street The Adelphi #05-03
Singapore 179803

+65 6233 3736

Notable Practitioner

English
Mandarin
Hokkien


Jurisdiction:

Singapore

Practice area:

Dispute resolution


Since the start of his career, Nichol has been involved in complex and high-profile cases.
Recognised as one of LexisNexis® 40 UNDER 40 2023, and described as “sharp and attentive”
(Legal 500, 2018 ed), Nichol has earned the trust and confidence of a many clients, co-counsel
and instructing counsel. He is an effective and confident communicator, both in Court and vis-à-vis his clients. Nichol is equally comfortable out-of-court, in arbitration and mediation advocacy work. He oftentimes secures optimal results through effective negotiation for his clients.

Nichol regularly takes on urgent and critical work. He approaches problems in a pragmatic,
result-focused way. He regularly represents MNCs, listed companies, SMEs, and high-net-worth individuals. His practice is focused on company and shareholder disputes, urgent injunctive relief, crisis litigation, disputes involving trusts law, hostile takeovers and disputes involving listed companies.

Nichol is often briefed by other legal practitioners as instructed counsel or as co-counsel. He is equally comfortable in a role as instructing counsel, and frequently works with foreign counsel in cross-border disputes.

With his interest in corporate governance, Nichol also takes on non-contentious briefs to provide regulatory and compliance advice. His experience in transactional and compliance work gives him an added edge in his dispute resolution practice.

  • Acted for the deputy of a plaintiff who lost mental capacity, to successfully obtain and maintain a Mareva injunction in support of a claim of approximately SG$ 9 million of assets, went on to substantially recover most of the assets at trial, which involved expert evidence on medical and mental capacity and forensic handwriting analysis. (Quek Peng Hock Henry v Chia Swee Hun [2023] SGHC 162)

  • Successfully resisted a hostile takeover extraordinary general meeting of a Singapore listed company by applying for a declaration that the requisitionists were not members of the company and argued that the requisitionists, even though shareholders of the listed company, were not entitled to call for an Extraordinary General Meeting of the company because they were not “members” of the company. This case sparked off interest in the technical differences between being a “shareholder” and a “member” of a company in Singapore, and the safeguards in place for minority protection in listed companies in Singapore. See here (USP Group Limited v Hinterland Energy Pte Ltd & Ors [2023] SGHC 106)

  • Represented a client who faced regulatory breaches for Ministry of Manpower legislation, for allegedly failing to ensure a safe environment for its participants. Client also faced civil claims for wrongful death claims from the participant’s dependents/estate. This was a high profile case attracting public scrutiny.

  • Represented a director of a Hong Kong listed entity that faced claims of breach of directors’ duties, fiduciary duties, forgery, breach of trust, in respect of certain financing and trade facilities granted by a financial institution to the operating subsidiaries of the Hong Kong listed entity.

 

Dispute resolution

  • Banking and financial services
  • Energy
  • Real estate

  • Advocate and Solicitor, Supreme Court of Singapore

  • Asia Network International Co. Ltd: Director, also Chairman of Nominating & Remuneration Committee, also Member of Audit Committee
  • Thai Institute of Directors: Member
  • Singapore Academy of Law: Member
  • The Law Society of Singapore: Member
  • Board of Nam Sieng Dragon & Lion Dance Activity Centre: Legal Advisor